Town of Washington edits and agrees on vision statement

WASHINGTON — Even the Declaration of Independence was revised by Congress. In the same spirit, in front of the 1776 American flag at the Millbrook firehouse, the residents of the town of Washington gathered on Saturday morning, March 5, to discuss and then agree on their own version of the town’s future. The meeting for the residents of the town of Washington to discuss their vision for the town for the next 20 years adjourned one hour early, a few minutes before the siren on the firehouse sounded noon. After almost three hours of open, civil discussion and exchange of ideas, full-time residents and weekenders reached agreement on the precise wording of the draft vision statement that will be used as a touchstone in the creation of a new Comprehensive Plan for the town.After months of disagreement, accusations and resignations, a group of about 100 Washington citizens gathered to start over again. The challenging acoustics of the firehouse were overcome by a professional sound crew. Multiple mikes distributed around the audience permitted everyone to be heard. Joshua Mackey of the plan’s Administrative Committee masterfully guided the lurching discussion toward consensus.After a brief history of progress to date by Margaret Irwin of River Street, the plan’s outside consultant, Howard Schuman, read the original draft vision statement. The draft included references to “diversity of housing” and “managed development.” Schuman said he was out-voted on the wording of the vision and pointed out that most people who completed the community survey had not ranked these issues as being very important. Next up was Stan Morse, who read his own shortened, 96-word version based on the original 205-word draft read by Schuman. Morse made it clear that he was presenting this version as a private citizen with no background in planning because the original was far too long. “A vision is who we are and what we wish to be,” explained Morse. His version omitted the housing issue entirely and substituted “managed growth” for “carefully managed development.” There was a big round of applause when he sat down. A third, completely different, more descriptive approach was suggested by village resident Tony Sloan, who has been an urban planner since 1964. His imaginative vision included things the town did not want, like “sprawl and its costs.”After fielding comments about affordable housing, the length of the vision statement, the distinction between the town and the village, Mackey managed to get the group to give an indication of their support for the three approaches. The original vision statement didn’t even win five votes. The group then moved forward to look at the details of Morse’s concise statement, with more discussion around the housing issue. Schuman explained that the phrase “diversity of housing” was really a euphemism for “affordable housing,” and that the committee had found substantial affordable housing already existed. Committee member Karen Mosca provided additional background on the issue, explaining diversity of housing as workforce housing, which did not necessarily mean new housing. Fernando Nottebohm asserted that housing did not belong in the vision and that “politicians are not to be trusted.” He received a large round of applause. In response to Margaret Doyle’s request for clarification on whether there was a legal requirement to include housing, Mackey said, “Addressing it is not making a provision.” He asked if the public felt it should be included. Judy Bondis, a former village trustee, pointed out that only 12 teachers in the Millbrook school district could afford to live in the town. Paul Schwartz, a member of the town planning board who owns rental property, commented that there is a lot of housing available for rent. He did a quick calculation of the cost of building a modest 1,200-square-foot house. In order to carry the mortgage and taxes, he estimated that an annual income of $75,000 to $90,000 would be necessary.Fernando Nottebohm suggested striking “managed growth” from the Morse version.“We don’t want large gates for people to drive cement trucks through,” he said. Through the morning people stood up and spoke, acknowledging each other — “I agree with the guy in the brown sweater” — and asking to focus on the important issues where everyone agreed, like rural character and safe drinking water. One commenter said, “I didn’t expect such a sensible discussion.” A vote by show of hands eliminated reference to any kind of growth, managed or otherwise, and to housing. Having eliminated those issues, the focus turned to fiscal responsibility and taxes. Candy Anderson brought up the issue of fairness in property assessments.After a suggestion that financial sustainability be added, David Strayer, another committee member, said that the statement should just say, “We want lower taxes, if that’s what you mean.” Kate Farrell, another committee member, was busy at the front of the room adding suggestions like “fair” and “equitable” and then crossing them out on white flip charts.At the end, about 30 people agreed to leave that part almost the way Morse wrote it: “We believe in managing our fiscal house responsibly.”Nottebohm, an ecologist, suggested removing the phrase “plants and animals” and simply use natural habitat. Everyone seemed to like that, but then decided to keep the plants and animals as well. “In the village” was added to diverse local business community, and the historic preservation section was modified. The entire, edited vision statement was read, and the group agreed it was what they, the people, wanted. Everyone was surprised and pleased by the results and the process which brought the community together.

Latest News

South Kent School’s unofficial March reunion

Elmarko Jackson was named a 2023 McDonald’s All American in his senior year at South Kent School. He helped lead the Cardinals to a New England Prep School Athletic Conference (NEPSAC) AAA title victory and was recruited to play at the University of Kansas. This March he will play point guard for the Jayhawks when they enter the tournament as a No. 4 seed against (13) Samford University.

Riley Klein

SOUTH KENT — March Madness will feature seven former South Kent Cardinals who now play on Division 1 NCAA teams.

The top-tier high school basketball program will be well represented with graduates from each of the past three years heading to “The Big Dance.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Hotchkiss grads dancing with Yale

Nick Townsend helped Yale win the Ivy League.

Screenshot from ESPN+ Broadcast

LAKEVILLE — Yale University advanced to the NCAA men’s basketball tournament after a buzzer-beater win over Brown University in the Ivy League championship game Sunday, March 17.

On Yale’s roster this year are two graduates of The Hotchkiss School: Nick Townsend, class of ‘22, and Jack Molloy, class of ‘21. Townsend wears No. 42 and Molloy wears No. 33.

Keep ReadingShow less
Handbells of St. Andrew’s to ring out Easter morning

Anne Everett and Bonnie Rosborough wait their turn to sound notes as bell ringers practicing to take part in the Easter morning service at St. Andrew’s Church.

Kathryn Boughton

KENT—There will be a joyful noise in St. Andrew’s Church Easter morning when a set of handbells donated to the church some 40 years ago are used for the first time by a choir currently rehearsing with music director Susan Guse.

Guse said that the church got the valuable three-octave set when Harlem Valley Psychiatric Center closed in the late 1980s and the bells were donated to the church. “The center used the bells for music therapy for younger patients. Our priest then was chaplain there and when the center closed, he brought the bells here,” she explained.

Keep ReadingShow less
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Penguin Random House

‘Picasso’s War” by Foreign Affairs senior editor Hugh Eakin, who has written about the art world for publications like The New York Review of Books, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and The New York Times, is not about Pablo Picasso’s time in Nazi-occupied Paris and being harassed by the Gestapo, nor about his 1937 oil painting “Guernica,” in response to the aerial bombing of civilians in the Basque town during the Spanish Civil War.

Instead, the Penguin Random House book’s subtitle makes a clearer statement of intent: “How Modern Art Came To America.” This war was not between military forces but a cultural war combating America’s distaste for the emerging modernism that had flourished in Europe in the early decades of the 20th century.

Keep ReadingShow less