Malloy Should Renegotiate, This Time For The Public

When it comes to the concessions agreement that recently failed the state employee union coalition’s complicated ratification process, what’s the difference between “clarifying” and “renegotiating”? “Clarifying” is what Gov. Malloy said he was willing to do about the rejected agreement. “Renegotiating” is what the unions want him to do but what he said he wouldn’t. The other day they agreed to start talking again. About what remains to be seen.Presumably “renegotiating” means a substantial change in contract terms and a loss of face for the governor, who already has lost face by being so gentle with the unions, pretty-pleasing them from the moment of his inauguration in January only for them to spurn him and explode the state budget just hours before it was to take effect. In response, the governor has undertaken to lay off thousands of state employees so that, he says, he can recover the contract savings that were budgeted but not obtained.But renegotiating is not just a risk that Malloy will lose more face. It’s also an opportunity for him to regain respect — by negotiating aggressively in the public interest this time.The decisive opposition to the concessions agreement among union members is said to have involved changes in the state medical insurance program, changes requiring employees to submit to preventive care. Now the unions are distressed by the layoffs as well.The governor could offer to oblige them, to drop the preventive care requirement and cancel the layoffs, while asking a lot in return: getting rid of the now-infamous “longevity pay”; freezing salaries throughout the new contract, not just for two years; advancing the expiration of the benefits provisions, now 2017, to the end of the current state administration in January 2015 so the next governor has a free hand; guaranteeing against layoffs for only one year instead of four; and putting new employees in a 401(k) retirement savings plan so that the state’s defined-benefit plan, badly underfunded and an extravagance, gradually expires.Then the governor would be hard to argue with. After all, he offered the unions the most generous contract in the country. Their leaders accepted it, as did 57 percent of union members. But with their undemocratic ratification process, the unions turned out to be bargaining in bad faith and caused state government huge inconvenience, the budget’s destruction, as well as political mortification for the governor. That is, the governor could tell the unions that if they want another round of negotiations, they’ll have to pay for the mess they made with the first one.Of course the governor might lose the affection of the unions this way. But having just been humiliated by them, he might wonder how much more their friendship is worth. New York’s new governor, Andrew Cuomo, has exacted sacrifice from public employee unions and other beneficiaries of state spending and finds himself very popular with everyone else. Malloy might regain the public’s respect if he too began to articulate the public interest.On the other hand, if there’s no renegotiation and the layoffs proceed, Connecticut might live with that just as well. The long saga of the union negotiations, now threatening to consume the new state administration’s entire first year, has demonstrated the government’s timidity in the face of both the state employee and the municipal employee unions, which themselves were in effect guaranteed against concessions when the governor and Legislature refused to reduce state financial grants to towns. It’s simple political arithmetic. Connecticut has about 50,000 state employees and 160,000 municipal employees, and if each has a like-minded spouse, child or parent who votes, they constitute a distinct interest of more than 300,000 people, more than half the 567,000 votes it took to win last year’s election for governor. No force in politics in Connecticut or combination of forces comes close to balancing that; indeed, right now there seems to be no other force in state politics at all, Connecticut having taken to the extreme James Reston’s maxim that all politics is based on the indifference of the majority. But there is enough of an informed public left in Connecticut to sense when its interest is being articulated.In any case, in these circumstances anything that reduces the influence of a special interest is a step back toward democracy, so that the three branches of government in Connecticut might become something other than the unions, the lawyers and the liquor stores.Chris Powell is managing editor of the Journal Inquirer in Manchester.

Latest News

South Kent School’s unofficial March reunion

Elmarko Jackson was named a 2023 McDonald’s All American in his senior year at South Kent School. He helped lead the Cardinals to a New England Prep School Athletic Conference (NEPSAC) AAA title victory and was recruited to play at the University of Kansas. This March he will play point guard for the Jayhawks when they enter the tournament as a No. 4 seed against (13) Samford University.

Riley Klein

SOUTH KENT — March Madness will feature seven former South Kent Cardinals who now play on Division 1 NCAA teams.

The top-tier high school basketball program will be well represented with graduates from each of the past three years heading to “The Big Dance.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Hotchkiss grads dancing with Yale

Nick Townsend helped Yale win the Ivy League.

Screenshot from ESPN+ Broadcast

LAKEVILLE — Yale University advanced to the NCAA men’s basketball tournament after a buzzer-beater win over Brown University in the Ivy League championship game Sunday, March 17.

On Yale’s roster this year are two graduates of The Hotchkiss School: Nick Townsend, class of ‘22, and Jack Molloy, class of ‘21. Townsend wears No. 42 and Molloy wears No. 33.

Keep ReadingShow less
Handbells of St. Andrew’s to ring out Easter morning

Anne Everett and Bonnie Rosborough wait their turn to sound notes as bell ringers practicing to take part in the Easter morning service at St. Andrew’s Church.

Kathryn Boughton

KENT—There will be a joyful noise in St. Andrew’s Church Easter morning when a set of handbells donated to the church some 40 years ago are used for the first time by a choir currently rehearsing with music director Susan Guse.

Guse said that the church got the valuable three-octave set when Harlem Valley Psychiatric Center closed in the late 1980s and the bells were donated to the church. “The center used the bells for music therapy for younger patients. Our priest then was chaplain there and when the center closed, he brought the bells here,” she explained.

Keep ReadingShow less
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Penguin Random House

‘Picasso’s War” by Foreign Affairs senior editor Hugh Eakin, who has written about the art world for publications like The New York Review of Books, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and The New York Times, is not about Pablo Picasso’s time in Nazi-occupied Paris and being harassed by the Gestapo, nor about his 1937 oil painting “Guernica,” in response to the aerial bombing of civilians in the Basque town during the Spanish Civil War.

Instead, the Penguin Random House book’s subtitle makes a clearer statement of intent: “How Modern Art Came To America.” This war was not between military forces but a cultural war combating America’s distaste for the emerging modernism that had flourished in Europe in the early decades of the 20th century.

Keep ReadingShow less