Little fanfare over state budget debate

With almost all news being drowned out by Sunday’s slaying of international terror suspect Osama bin Laden, it would not be surprising if many people missed Tuesday’s state news, that the Connecticut Senate passed a two-year, $40.1 billion budget, in a deal reached between legislative leaders and Gov. Dannel P. Malloy.It was an opportune week to push the economic passage through, as debate regarding the subject paled in comparison to the staggering details of the mission performed by U.S. Navy SEALs in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Suffice it to say there was much less fanfare over the state budget than in previous years.Still, there are reasons to be worried about Connecticut’s economic future, in which residents, businesses, state organizations and nonprofits have been repeatedly urged to accept shared sacrifice.The problem with this concept lies in the the fairness of its implementation. Numerous legislators have pointed out that the budget will be good for big business in Connecticut, with endorsements coming from the CEOs of major corporations, but little has been said about how the budget will affect daily life for ordinary citizens, who will see taxes increased and services reduced.For Winsted and towns throughout Litchfield County, where population growth has been minimal, so will be the increases in funding. As school systems and municipalities struggle to balance their books, affluent towns like Greenwich will receive significant increases in state aid. Colleges and universities will see reductions in funding, and state employees will give back a significant chunk of the benefits packages promised to them when they were hired.In an age in which corporations have been outed across the nation for not paying any taxes, and in a state where corporate tax returns are allowed to be kept secret, it is astounding that Connecticut continues to coddle its most fortunate citizens while telling everyone else that shared sacrifice is a virtue.Following passage of the budget and the governor’s signature, Connecticut residents should focus their efforts on tracking how much of the sacrifice is truly being shared by affluent residents, communities and corporations, and how much is being asked of the middle class and the poor. The goal of future legislation should be to correct the obvious inequities.

Latest News

Love is in the atmosphere

Author Anne Lamott

Sam Lamott

On Tuesday, April 9, The Bardavon 1869 Opera House in Poughkeepsie was the setting for a talk between Elizabeth Lesser and Anne Lamott, with the focus on Lamott’s newest book, “Somehow: Thoughts on Love.”

A best-selling novelist, Lamott shared her thoughts about the book, about life’s learning experiences, as well as laughs with the audience. Lesser, an author and co-founder of the Omega Institute in Rhinebeck, interviewed Lamott in a conversation-like setting that allowed watchers to feel as if they were chatting with her over a coffee table.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reading between the lines in historic samplers

Alexandra Peter's collection of historic samplers includes items from the family of "The House of the Seven Gables" author Nathaniel Hawthorne.

Cynthia Hochswender

The home in Sharon that Alexandra Peters and her husband, Fred, have owned for the past 20 years feels like a mini museum. As you walk through the downstairs rooms, you’ll see dozens of examples from her needlework sampler collection. Some are simple and crude, others are sophisticated and complex. Some are framed, some lie loose on the dining table.

Many of them have museum cards, explaining where those samplers came from and why they are important.

Keep ReadingShow less