Exactly where does all the money go?

Numbers being tossed at us by Wall Street, force-fed to the federal government and argued over in state budgets are so far beyond our understanding that they have little meaning to most of us anymore.

If I said $1 million to you, you might have some idea how big that number is. Maybe you will think it is three times the value of your house or apartment.

If I said $1 billion, can you really imagine 3,000 homes? What would that look like in your imagination? Then can you see $1 billion being the size of a small town?

Now what if I say $1 trillion? Can you see 3 million or 4 million homes? Can you picture these homes filling an area, for example, as large as San Francisco?

That’s the problem with inflation; we really have no idea what money numbers mean any more. And when the news tells us our state budget is in the billions, can we really understand what that size of money represents?

How about the bailout money Bush gave to the purveyors of silly numbers on Wall Street? Do you really understand what that could buy or does it merely seem like a really big, unfathomable number? How about the stimulus money? What can, what could, it buy?

u      u      u

So, let’s look at what governments have used money for in the past and what it means in today’s values. We’re going to look at some really large sums. Let’s start with Eisenhower.

Eisenhower announced that he was going to increase spending taxpayers’ money on a brand new, expanded interstate road system. His stimulus reasons for doing so and the political storm that ensued are not the point here. Right or wrong, on top of considerable funds already allocated to new highways since Roosevelt, he spent an additional $25 million a year for fiscal years (FY) 1954 and 1955. But in 1954, after a dramatic speech, he forced through legislation that authorized an additional $175 million annually for FY 1956 and 1957.

Seems like a pittance in today’s numbers, doesn’t it? Well, then it was huge. Considering that the median home price was $10,250 in 1954, this meant that he was spending the equivalent of 17,073 homes a year for two years (1956 and 1957) on top of the 2,500 homes a year he spent in 1954 and 1955. So, Eisenhower committed stimulus public funds for four years that amounted to more than 39,000 homes.

However, today’s median home costs $208,600, so his four-year stimulus highway budget was a little over $8 billion in today’s money.

See? When you compare apples to apples (homes price to home price), the silly numbers we hear about today begin to make sense, or at least are understandable.

u      u      u

If you really want crazy numbers, take the nuclear armament and delivery question, as part of the defense budget. It amounts, for the years 1962 to 1982, to about $14 trillion dollars in today’s money or about 67 million homes (think all of New York state).

On the other hand, let’s look at just one part of the $275 billion public works current stimulus. Taking the road improvement part separately, this represents $28 billion, or currently about 134,000 homes. That’s about three-and-a-half times what Eisenhower spent (in equivalent home cost).

Why does it cost so much to improve, as the president announced, “only 150,000 miles of our roads?� That represents only 4 percent of all the roads we already have or, if you want to measure federal roads, about 15 percent of current highways.

Well, for a start, Eisenhower only built 42,000 miles of federal highways. Back then, that was thinking big. Now we’re so choked with roads any serious improvement has to deal with 3,750,000 miles of roads in America. We’ve created a roadway nightmare we may never be able to afford to maintain.

u      u      u

Back in the ’50s, Eisenhower had higher tax rates to benefit from. The low rate was 20 percent and the top rate was 87 percent. Compare that to today’s 10 percent going up to 36 percent.

And, in our comparison to back then, houses were more affordable in 1954 when compared with earning capacity. The average wage in 1954 was $3,155 (about a third of the average house price). Compare that to today’s average wage of $40,700 (about a fifth of the average house price, inflated as a business for banking).

The other reason it may have been cheaper to undertake public works in Eisenhower’s day was because, back then, corporations were satisfied with 3 percent to 8 percent gross profits on average. Today, Wall Street demands 8 percent to 20 percent gross profit margins from corporations.

When fulfilling government contracts, contracters have the sharp pencil boys of Wall Street keeping tabs; the very purveyors of silly numbers based on greed are the same bunch whose ethics always seem to jam affordable progress in America.

Peter Riva, formerly of Amenia Union, lives in New Mexico.

Latest News

South Kent School’s unofficial March reunion

Elmarko Jackson was named a 2023 McDonald’s All American in his senior year at South Kent School. He helped lead the Cardinals to a New England Prep School Athletic Conference (NEPSAC) AAA title victory and was recruited to play at the University of Kansas. This March he will play point guard for the Jayhawks when they enter the tournament as a No. 4 seed against (13) Samford University.

Riley Klein

SOUTH KENT — March Madness will feature seven former South Kent Cardinals who now play on Division 1 NCAA teams.

The top-tier high school basketball program will be well represented with graduates from each of the past three years heading to “The Big Dance.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Hotchkiss grads dancing with Yale

Nick Townsend helped Yale win the Ivy League.

Screenshot from ESPN+ Broadcast

LAKEVILLE — Yale University advanced to the NCAA men’s basketball tournament after a buzzer-beater win over Brown University in the Ivy League championship game Sunday, March 17.

On Yale’s roster this year are two graduates of The Hotchkiss School: Nick Townsend, class of ‘22, and Jack Molloy, class of ‘21. Townsend wears No. 42 and Molloy wears No. 33.

Keep ReadingShow less
Handbells of St. Andrew’s to ring out Easter morning

Anne Everett and Bonnie Rosborough wait their turn to sound notes as bell ringers practicing to take part in the Easter morning service at St. Andrew’s Church.

Kathryn Boughton

KENT—There will be a joyful noise in St. Andrew’s Church Easter morning when a set of handbells donated to the church some 40 years ago are used for the first time by a choir currently rehearsing with music director Susan Guse.

Guse said that the church got the valuable three-octave set when Harlem Valley Psychiatric Center closed in the late 1980s and the bells were donated to the church. “The center used the bells for music therapy for younger patients. Our priest then was chaplain there and when the center closed, he brought the bells here,” she explained.

Keep ReadingShow less
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Penguin Random House

‘Picasso’s War” by Foreign Affairs senior editor Hugh Eakin, who has written about the art world for publications like The New York Review of Books, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and The New York Times, is not about Pablo Picasso’s time in Nazi-occupied Paris and being harassed by the Gestapo, nor about his 1937 oil painting “Guernica,” in response to the aerial bombing of civilians in the Basque town during the Spanish Civil War.

Instead, the Penguin Random House book’s subtitle makes a clearer statement of intent: “How Modern Art Came To America.” This war was not between military forces but a cultural war combating America’s distaste for the emerging modernism that had flourished in Europe in the early decades of the 20th century.

Keep ReadingShow less