Water power keapt the wheels turning at historic mills

In the days prior to electricity, people had to be resourceful to find energy. The power to drive gears, belts or other devices that converted energy of one sort into energy of another sort was supplied by animals, humans, wind or water.

The hilly uplands of Litchfield County provided ample amounts of water power, hence the proliferation of mills throughout the region.  The thin soils and rocky terrain, plus the relatively short growing season made agricultural endeavor risky at best, hence the emphasis on manufacturing.

Locally, the 18th and 19th centuries’ mills, forges and tanneries were powered by three basic types of water wheel: the overshot, undershot and breast. Because of the topography, the most common type around these parts was the overshot wheel.

In the case of the overshot, the water was let into the buckets at the top of the wheel; in the undershot, at the bottom; and the breast wheel had its intake somewhere in between. The overshot required a relatively high waterfall onto a large and expensive wheel.

The undershot wheel was less efficient and, generally speaking, was used only when the fall was small, say 4 to 6 feet, and there was plenty of water. Most tide mills had undershot wheels, and were located along the coast and the lower reaches of the rivers emptying into Long Island Sound.

In the later part of the 18th century, when Colebrook and the surrounding towns were being carved from the virgin forest, breast and overshot wheels increased in popularity. This was due in part to the increased efficiency in situations where two or more mills had to share the stream flow of a single dam, as they often did. Two mills would commonly be built at a single dam, one on either side of the stream.

This situation did not occur in Colebrook, as far as we know. This was due partly to the relatively small, steep-sided streams, and partly because of the sparse population. Colebrook River was the only locale that actually had dams that could easily have provided mill sites on either side of the river, but in all known cases, there was only one mill to one dam.

If, as was often the case in Colebrook, one side was too rugged, a short canal might be dug on the more favorable side and one mill placed downstream from the other. If a stream was particularly well-suited for providing power, such as the Blackberry River from Norfolk Center to West Norfolk, there could be a half-dozen mills or more drawing from one or two dams.

Milling tended to be a seasonal profession due to the cold winters experienced in southern New England; the wheels would ice up and become completely inoperable early in the winter season and would remain so until March or April.

The only way around this situation was to do what Richard Smith did with his forge on Still River in southeastern Colebrook, and that was to enclose the wheels and install stoves. Initially there were four enclosed wheels, and after the forge was destroyed by fire in 1781, it was immediately rebuilt with five enclosed wheels, which provided the ability to produce a large amount of product at one facility.

Although we do not know the exact type of wheels employed at Smith’s forge, in all probability two types, the overshot and undershot, existed. The reasoning is that the overall drop from the intake above the dam to the base of the foundation at the edge of Still River is 12 feet 4 inches. As the dimensions of the forge building did not exceed 40 feet, the water was brought to either side of the forge by wooden flumes, which would have employed first an overshot wheel and then an undershot wheel between the first wheel and the bank of the stream, where the water returned to its source.

The most commonly found mills in Colebrook were the sawmill, grist mill, cider mill and fulling mill. There was also a large cotton mill on the West Branch of the Farmington River and several forges in three different locations around town, all of which employed water wheels for the power required to operate their equipment.

These mills were so constructed that each wheel turned in its own stone-lined enclosure called a wheelpit, and each wheelpit was linked to the river by a channel called a raceway. The portion of the raceway that delivered water to the wheel was called the headrace; the portion that returned it to the river was called the tailrace.

Some sawmills employed two different types of wheels, both of which fell generally into the category of an undershot wheel.

The first, called a flutter wheel, operated the up-and-down blade while driving the log into the blade. This looked somewhat like the propulsion wheel on a stern-wheeler river boat.

This apparently was not a speedy process, as we have written accounts of children riding the logs as they were being pulled into the saw. Considering the protection now afforded children these days, I can just imagine the howls of protest that would arise if such activity were attempted today!

The second wheel was a tub wheel. It powered the machinery that withdrew the log once it had a board cut from it.

Both of these were driven by the force of the water striking against the blades. In a fulling mill, woolen cloth woven by local families was pounded by wooden hammers to clean and thicken it. The hammers were powered by an undershot wheel. This would have been much larger than the flutter wheel, which was also turned by the force of the water flowing under it and striking its blades.

Grist mills ground corn and other grains for the area’s farmers. They were powered by a large overshot wheel. Instead of having blades, the perimeter of the overshot wheel was constructed with a continuous row of wooden troughs called buckets. Water from the headrace poured over the top of the wheel and into the buckets. The weight of the water in the buckets turned the wheel.

When the equipment in a mill couldn’t be run directly from the shaft of the water wheel, a system of gears, additional shafts, pulleys and belts called a power train was required.

Bob Grigg is the town historian in Colebrook.

Latest News

The artistic life of Joelle Sander

"Flowers" by the late artist and writer Joelle Sander.

Cornwall Library

The Cornwall Library unveiled its latest art exhibition, “Live It Up!,” showcasing the work of the late West Cornwall resident Joelle Sander on Saturday, April 13. The twenty works on canvas on display were curated in partnership with the library with the help of her son, Jason Sander, from the collection of paintings she left behind to him. Clearly enamored with nature in all its seasons, Sander, who split time between her home in New York City and her country house in Litchfield County, took inspiration from the distinctive white bark trunks of the area’s many birch trees, the swirling snow of Connecticut’s wintery woods, and even the scenic view of the Audubon in Sharon. The sole painting to depict fauna is a melancholy near-abstract outline of a cow, rootless in a miasma haze of plum and Persian blue paint. Her most prominently displayed painting, “Flowers,” effectively builds up layers of paint so that her flurry of petals takes on a three-dimensional texture in their rough application, reminiscent of another Cornwall artist, Don Bracken.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Seder to savor in Sheffield

Rabbi Zach Fredman

Zivar Amrami

On April 23, Race Brook Lodge in Sheffield will host “Feast of Mystics,” a Passover Seder that promises to provide ecstasy for the senses.

“’The Feast of Mystics’ was a title we used for events back when I was running The New Shul,” said Rabbi Zach Fredman of his time at the independent creative community in the West Village in New York City.

Keep ReadingShow less
Art scholarship now honors HVRHS teacher Warren Prindle

Warren Prindle

Patrick L. Sullivan

Legendary American artist Jasper Johns, perhaps best known for his encaustic depictions of the U.S. flag, formed the Foundation for Contemporary Arts in 1963, operating the volunteer-run foundation in his New York City artist studio with the help of his co-founder, the late American composer and music theorist John Cage. Although Johns stepped down from his chair position in 2015, today the Foundation for Community Arts continues its pledge to sponsor emerging artists, with one of its exemplary honors being an $80 thousand dollar scholarship given to a graduating senior from Housatonic Valley Regional High School who is continuing his or her visual arts education on a college level. The award, first established in 2004, is distributed in annual amounts of $20,000 for four years of university education.

In 2024, the Contemporary Visual Arts Scholarship was renamed the Warren Prindle Arts Scholarship. A longtime art educator and mentor to young artists at HVRHS, Prindle announced that he will be retiring from teaching at the end of the 2023-24 school year. Recently in 2022, Prindle helped establish the school’s new Kearcher-Monsell Gallery in the library and recruited a team of student interns to help curate and exhibit shows of both student and community-based professional artists. One of Kearcher-Monsell’s early exhibitions featured the work of Theda Galvin, who was later announced as the 2023 winner of the foundation’s $80,000 scholarship. Prindle has also championed the continuation of the annual Blue and Gold juried student art show, which invites the public to both view and purchase student work in multiple mediums, including painting, photography, and sculpture.

Keep ReadingShow less