Endorsements in the main races

We have many important decisions to make on Tuesday, Nov. 2, in the state and midterm Congressional elections, which we hope, above all, will be followed by a period of healing and reconciliation between opposing parties, who have produced some of the most fiercely exaggerated partisan disagreements in history, at the greatest monetary expense in history. Let’s hope all of the high-priced campaigning will actually produce results.

Governor

First on our list is the big race — for Connecticut governor. Faced with the choice between former Stamford Mayor Dan Malloy, Democrat, and former Iraqi Coalition Provisional Authority member Tom Foley, the Republican, there is simply no contest. Malloy has actually governed in Connecticut, he has produced positive economic results in Stamford and he has gained the respect of public officials on both sides of the aisle. A successful former prosecutor in New York, Malloy has shown himself to be dynamic, energetic and optimistic about the state’s future in the face of negativity from the opposing party.

The main thing Foley points out on his résumé is that he was a successful businessman, but he also served in the cushy position of U.S. ambassador to Ireland, in which he has not received much attention for doing anything, and for serving under J. Paul Bremer in the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, which was an unmitigated failure. The organization’s ineptitude only highlighted the illegality of the United States’ occupation of Iraq, which was the greatest military blunder of our time, forced upon the world by the George W. Bush administration. Suffice to say we’re not happy with the way things have gone there.

While Foley was assisting in our blundered operations in Iraq, Malloy was here in Connecticut working to bring new companies into our state and being applauded by Gov. M. Jodi Rell, the incumbent Republican, for his efforts. Now, all of a sudden, Republicans are calling him the bad guy, when it is Rell herself who is quitting her job in the midst of the state’s ongoing financial crisis.

Instead of bringing in another Republican governor to continue fighting with the state’s Democratic legislators, it’s time to end the Rowland-Rell era and give a Democratic gubernatorial administration a shot at solving the state’s fiscal problems.

U. S. Senate

In the Senate race made possible by the departure of Democrat Sen. Chris Dodd, Connecticut has received some begrudging national attention, as it sees a widely respected Democratic Attorney General Richard Blumenthal receiving a run for his money, literally, by former World Wrestling Entertainment CEO Linda McMahon, the Republican candidate. The jokes are over now, and McMahon is near the finish line in her $50 million quest to upset the status quo and attempt to buy her way into office with more signs, commercials and mailers than her opponent could have imagined.

Throughout the race, McMahon has taken to character attacks, attempting to paint the attorney general as disingenuous and out of touch. Some of that campaigning has been successful, and some of Blumenthal’s responses have been inadequate, shallow and disappointing. It has been a tough race, with a lot of mud-slinging and far too much money spent on making a professional wrestling multimillionaire czar look like an ordinary working woman. When the campaign was first launched, no one would have thought it only takes money to sway the minds of Connecticut voters, but judging by the polls, there is some truth to the notion.

In any case, we hope the investment doesn’t pay off and that Blumenthal takes the win in what should be a tight race. Connecticut’s AG is a good man with a solid history of helping working people and bringing lawsuits against companies that break the law in our state. He is on top of the issues and will be a key ally to both the president and our next governor in getting things done, including bringing more attention to Connecticut’s financial woes in Washington and finding ways to get us back on track.

U.S. Congressional 1st District

For Winstedites, being one of the towns in Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional 1st District goes along with a number of oddities here. The 1st District, after all, covers mostly towns in Hartford County, but we’re in Litchfield County. Our rivers are considered part of the Farmington Valley Watershed, while our water is tested by the Torrington Area Health District.

Suffice to say the wisdom of the redistricting process is lost on us, but we’re happy to know that powerful and widely popular Democratic Congressman John Larson is in our camp.

Though he hails from East Hartford, Larson has made numerous appearances in the Laurel City during each term to talk about everything from veterans’ benefits and wars in the Middle East to health and prescription care for senior citizens, while gaining prestige and influence in Washington, D.C.

Larson was one of the first people in Congress to speak out against the U.S. invasion of Iraq, which he accurately called “wrong-headed� back in 2003, but he has maintained steadfast support of both active-duty troops and veterans. He also supports preserving Social Security and Medicare and introduced legislation to allow the federal government to directly negotiate lower drug prices for 40 million Medicare beneficiaries.

Larson has welcomed debate with his three challengers: Republican Ann Brickley, Green Party candidate Ken Krayeske and Socialist Action candidate Christopher Hutchinson. The only challenger saying anything meaningful is Krayeske, who is hoping his candidacy will convince Larson to focus more attention on poor working people and to avoid putting military occupations before education and infrastructure issues. “We’re letting civil services crumble before our eyes,� Krayseske said in a recent debate.

Krayeske doesn’t have a chance of winning the Congressional seat this time around, but he has made the Larson race much more interesting by getting so involved in debates. We will stick with Larson as our choice for the 1st District, while hoping Krayeske’s campaign has a positive impact.

State House 63rd District

We think both people running for the 63rd District seat in the state House of Representatives are fine men. Incumbent Republican John Rigby has been a positive force here, volunteering at local events, working to help bring money to the district for Northwestern Connecticut Community College’s new nursing program and sticking to his ideology that Connecticut needs more investment in business if it wants to succeed and get out of its financial mess.

On the other hand, we are also fond of the challenger, Democrat William O. Riiska, son of the late Winsted Mayor William T. Riiska, who is on the ballot this time around after only achieving write-in status in the 2007 election. Riiska has political positions that are in contrast with Rigby’s, particularly in the area of the effectiveness of tax breaks and how much money is going to be needed to overcome an array of fiscal problems being felt by towns across the state. Fiscally conservative but socially liberal, Riiska may stand a better chance of getting things done.

The tiebreaker here comes in the fact that Rigby has essentially abandoned his work here to take a job working for a contractor in Afghanistan. During the last two months of his term, news has surfaced that a lender is foreclosing on his house and that he needed money to get his bills straight, so he took off to work for an unnamed aerospace firm for an unnamed sum. One can only imagine the strings that had to be pulled to arrange that.

Rigby deserves credit for taking on what is probably a dangerous and difficult assignment in order to make enough money to provide a good life for his family. It’s a courageous move and we applaud it. However, during the time he is away, he is not serving his constituents in any direct way. Taking two months off to go overseas is like going on vacation from your job to moonlight, while still being paid for the original job. It also no secret that Rigby previously worked here as a loan officer. One would expect a person in such a position to have better control over his personal finances. The whole situation makes Rigby look irresponsible.

A spokesman for Rigby said it is not known when the legislator is planning on returning to Connecticut. That’s simply unacceptable. William Riiska deserves a real shot at this seat and we hope he wins it.

Latest News

Love is in the atmosphere

Author Anne Lamott

Sam Lamott

On Tuesday, April 9, The Bardavon 1869 Opera House in Poughkeepsie was the setting for a talk between Elizabeth Lesser and Anne Lamott, with the focus on Lamott’s newest book, “Somehow: Thoughts on Love.”

A best-selling novelist, Lamott shared her thoughts about the book, about life’s learning experiences, as well as laughs with the audience. Lesser, an author and co-founder of the Omega Institute in Rhinebeck, interviewed Lamott in a conversation-like setting that allowed watchers to feel as if they were chatting with her over a coffee table.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reading between the lines in historic samplers

Alexandra Peter's collection of historic samplers includes items from the family of "The House of the Seven Gables" author Nathaniel Hawthorne.

Cynthia Hochswender

The home in Sharon that Alexandra Peters and her husband, Fred, have owned for the past 20 years feels like a mini museum. As you walk through the downstairs rooms, you’ll see dozens of examples from her needlework sampler collection. Some are simple and crude, others are sophisticated and complex. Some are framed, some lie loose on the dining table.

Many of them have museum cards, explaining where those samplers came from and why they are important.

Keep ReadingShow less