The art of the filibuster: A short venture in American history

In 1851, the Southern annexationist, General Narcisco Lopez, together with Kentucky Colonel William Chittendon and a small band of intrepid adventurers, “filibustered� their way, by armed expedition, into Cuba to wrest that island away from Spain, in contravention of two successive proclamations by presidents Taylor and Fillmore.

 They should have waited for Teddy Roosevelt and his “Rough Ridersâ€� in1898 to show how to do the job efficiently, effectively — and officially.

Colonel Crittendon and 50 other Southern volunteers were captured and executed, and shortly thereafter General Lopez was seized and publicly garroted in Havana. Although unable at the time to claim “Mission Accomplished,� they left the term “filibuster� (from a Dutch word for “pirate�) indelibly printed in the American lexicon.

Lessons from history are rarely learned. Thus the military adventurer William Walker, a few years later, led filibustering missions into Nicaragua and Honduras, where he was captured, courtmartialed and executed in 1860. What all this shows is that they knew how to deal with filibusterers in those days.

    u    u    u

Today, we are much more civilized, especially in the U.S. Senate, where the right of filibuster is enshrined in procedural Rule 22. (This is not the case in the House of Representatives, where members are accustomed to accepting a greater degree of personal constraint.)

Initially, the term “filibuster� in the Senate had a pejorative connotation, namely the “obstruction� of the work of that august body by means of endless, successive speechmaking. Over the years, with the Senate doing less and less work while making more and more speeches, the term has lost much of its pejorative meaning. It has become an increasingly routine way of doing business. Filibuster enables a partisan minority to obstruct the democratic principle of majority rule. The idea is better safe than sorry.

Now filibuster speechmaking is a long and tiring process for all concerned. So, to facilitate matters and preserve a more genteel sense of order in the Senate, it is no longer necessary under the Rules to actually invade another country or make lengthy speeches before a near empty chamber. Instead, it suffices for 41 members in the Senate to express a mere intention to filibuster, thus killing further consideration of the item, since it takes 60 votes to invoke closure of debate. You do the math.

    u    u    u

Thus on practically every significant piece of legislation or other important matter before the Senate, the Senators say: “To filibuster or not to filibuster, that is the question.� Yes, but it is not always obvious whether it is better to filibuster or not to filibuster. A case in point: Faced with the threat of the “nuclear option� (a change in the Rules), Democrats failed to filibuster against President George W. Bush’s nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. So, we got justices Roberts and Alito. Does that answer the question?

So, how should filibustering actually be done? Just ask those who do it best and the most. This year alone, a partisan minority in the U.S. Senate has launched 43 filibusters in the first seven months of the new Congress — an all time record. Silent but deadly. As a complementary strategy, President Bush has threatened 31 vetoes between May and August 2007 — another record. What are the beneficial outcomes of this form of cooperation between the executive and legislative branches of government?

    u    u    u

A partisan minority in the Senate has successfully blocked (or obstructed?) bipartisan reform legislation that would: (1) lower the price of prescription drugs for seniors; (2) invest in alternative energy sources while cutting subsidies for big oil; (3) require U.S. soldiers get adequate rest and training between tours in Iraq and Afghanistan; and (4) empower employees to join together to form unions at work.

Meanwhile, President Bush has vetoed legislation that would require him to end the occupation of Iraq and would allow stem cell research to go forward, in spite of the fact that each of these enjoyed overwhelming support from the American people and had passed both the House and Senate. In regard to other legislation that somehow got through Congress over the past six years, the president has conveniently attached “signing statements� warning us that he doesn’t necessarily intend to faithfully execute the law (notwithstanding the rather “quaint� oath of office provision in Article II of the Constitution of the United States).

    u    u    u

Filibustering in the Senate plus presidential vetoes and signing statements, some say, are a combined blessing in disguise. The risks of complex new legislation are avoided. The time and work of Congress is saved. Actual spending on social programs is greatly reduced. And the federal resources thus saved (namely your taxes) can be more fully devoted to President Bush’s own filibuster in Iraq — and perhaps Senator Lieberman’s in Iran. Thus, if we keep this up, we can truly say that this is a “do-nothing� Congress, and finally, yes, “Mission Accomplished.� Already, plans are under way for those who filibuster to blame those who are the victims of filibuster.

So, fear not. Senatorial filibustering is as American as apple pie. But will we ever see the end of it? Well, maybe. This is just a hypothetical question, not really a suggestion, but something worth thinking about: What would happen if it were the new majority in Congress that decided to exercise the “nuclear option�? What then?

Sharon resident Anthony Piel is a former director and legal counsel of the World Health Organization.

Latest News

South Kent School’s unofficial March reunion

Elmarko Jackson was named a 2023 McDonald’s All American in his senior year at South Kent School. He helped lead the Cardinals to a New England Prep School Athletic Conference (NEPSAC) AAA title victory and was recruited to play at the University of Kansas. This March he will play point guard for the Jayhawks when they enter the tournament as a No. 4 seed against (13) Samford University.

Riley Klein

SOUTH KENT — March Madness will feature seven former South Kent Cardinals who now play on Division 1 NCAA teams.

The top-tier high school basketball program will be well represented with graduates from each of the past three years heading to “The Big Dance.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Hotchkiss grads dancing with Yale

Nick Townsend helped Yale win the Ivy League.

Screenshot from ESPN+ Broadcast

LAKEVILLE — Yale University advanced to the NCAA men’s basketball tournament after a buzzer-beater win over Brown University in the Ivy League championship game Sunday, March 17.

On Yale’s roster this year are two graduates of The Hotchkiss School: Nick Townsend, class of ‘22, and Jack Molloy, class of ‘21. Townsend wears No. 42 and Molloy wears No. 33.

Keep ReadingShow less
Handbells of St. Andrew’s to ring out Easter morning

Anne Everett and Bonnie Rosborough wait their turn to sound notes as bell ringers practicing to take part in the Easter morning service at St. Andrew’s Church.

Kathryn Boughton

KENT—There will be a joyful noise in St. Andrew’s Church Easter morning when a set of handbells donated to the church some 40 years ago are used for the first time by a choir currently rehearsing with music director Susan Guse.

Guse said that the church got the valuable three-octave set when Harlem Valley Psychiatric Center closed in the late 1980s and the bells were donated to the church. “The center used the bells for music therapy for younger patients. Our priest then was chaplain there and when the center closed, he brought the bells here,” she explained.

Keep ReadingShow less
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Picasso’s American debut was a financial flop
Penguin Random House

‘Picasso’s War” by Foreign Affairs senior editor Hugh Eakin, who has written about the art world for publications like The New York Review of Books, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and The New York Times, is not about Pablo Picasso’s time in Nazi-occupied Paris and being harassed by the Gestapo, nor about his 1937 oil painting “Guernica,” in response to the aerial bombing of civilians in the Basque town during the Spanish Civil War.

Instead, the Penguin Random House book’s subtitle makes a clearer statement of intent: “How Modern Art Came To America.” This war was not between military forces but a cultural war combating America’s distaste for the emerging modernism that had flourished in Europe in the early decades of the 20th century.

Keep ReadingShow less