State Judges Don't Want Transparency


Everyone can be happy with the Judicial Review Council’s verdict in the case of former Connecticut Chief Justice William J. Sullivan — a 15-day suspension from his part-time retirement job as senior justice.

The council suspended Sullivan for delaying publication of a potentially controversial Supreme Court decision so that a colleague who concurred in it, Justice Peter T. Zarella, might not have to answer for it when the General Assembly considered his nomination to succeed Sullivan as chief justice. The Supreme Court decision at issue, like so many other Connecticut court decisions, held that the courts don’t have to make records public under freedom-of-information law.

Sullivan’s punishment may seem light but the big problem here is not the misconduct of one judge but the arrogance and unaccountability of the whole of Connecticut’s judiciary, the correction of which is well under way thanks to the Sullivan scandal. No one aggrieved by judicial arrogance and unaccountability could be mollified by


anyparticular punishment for Sullivan.

 

In regard to the former chief justice individually, Connecticut needs only for his political interference with the administration of justice to be acknowledged as wrong, which even Sullivan himself eventually did. As a part-time judge now Sullivan can’t do much more harm, and the acting chief justice, David M. Borden, is trying to induce the courts to adopt a program of openness.


u u u


Unfortunately that program has its limits. Indeed, its very


motiveis to be limited — to make the judiciary only as accountable as is necessary to reserve its ability to be unaccountable again someday.

 

For in seeking to get out from under the Sullivan scandal, the acting chief justice and most other judges are defending their power to legislate the judiciary’s rules independently of the General Assembly and the governor. While the state Constitution says the powers and jurisdiction of Connecticut’s courts "shall be defined by law," for decades the courts have intimidated governors and legislatures into thinking that the ordinary legislative process does not cover rules for the courts as it covers rules for the other two branches of government.

Connecticut’s judges claim that making court rules through ordinary legislation would violate the constitutional principle of the separation of powers of the branches of government. But that is exactly how those rules are made for the federal courts — through legislation enacted by Congress and the president. There is no suggestion of a "separation of powers" problem there. That is, the constitutional claim of Connecticut’s judiciary is not just bogus but

deliberatelybogus, another contrivance.

 

The remedy for this contrivance is an amendment to the state Constitution making explicit the authority of the Legislature and governor to legislate rules for the openness and accountability of the courts. This is where the new support of Connecticut’s courts for freedom of information ends, including the support of the acting chief justice, Borden.


u u u


Meeting the other day with the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information, Justice Borden said he saw no connection between the rule-making power and the Sullivan scandal. But of course the rule-making power was the issue in the Supreme Court decision whose publication Sullivan delayed for political purposes, prompting his reprimand. Further, Borden can offer no guarantee of the judiciary’s new policy of openness. He is a friend of openness now but he will be gone in less than a year, having reached mandatory retirement age. All Borden can do is speculate that it will be hard for the courts to undo their new openness.

Having no tradition and only grudging support from most judges, if that, the new openness will be


easyto undo and surely willbe eroded over time if the judges are left to themselves. Indeed, if the judges meant the new openness to be permanent, they would be happy to use the Constitution to ensure it — as the Constitution already does with its grand but unenforced proclamation that "all courts shall be open." That Borden and his colleagues oppose any constitutional guarantee of openness is proof of its necessity.

 


u u u


Achieving that guarantee will be a struggle as long as the General Assembly’s Judiciary Committee remains in the hands of lawyer-legislators who themselves often have aspirations to judgeships. The committee’s co-chairmen, Sen. Andrew J. McDonald, D-Stamford, and Rep. Michael P. Lawlor, D-East Haven, both lawyers, are already working to divert their committee’s inquiry into the Sullivan scandal away from the question of who makes the rules for the courts. The co-chairmen somehow think the scandal is how Governor Rell came to nominate Zarella for chief justice, even though the nomination was quickly withdrawn. Thus McDonald and Lawlor are signaling that the Judiciary Committee is content with the judiciary’s usurping the legislature’s powers, and the committee remains the great enabler of everything that is wrong in the courts, not the watchdog it should be.

 


Chris Powell is managing editor of the Journal Inquirer in Manchester, Conn.

Latest News

Bunny Williams's 
‘Life in the Garden’
Rizzoli

In 1979, interior decorator Bunny Williams and her husband, antiques dealer John Rosselli, had a fateful meeting with a poorly cared for — in Williams’s words, “unspoiled” — 18th-century white clapboard home.

“I am not sure if I believe in destiny, but I do know that after years of looking for a house, my palms began to perspire when I turned onto a tree-lined driveway in a small New England village,” Williams wrote in her 2005 book, “An Affair with a House.” The Federal manor high on a hill, along with several later additions that included a converted carriage shed and an 1840-built barn, were constructed on what had been the homestead property of Falls Village’s Brewster family, descendants of Mayflower passenger William Brewster, an English Separatist and Protestant leader in Plymouth Colony.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Creators: Sitting down with Garet Wierdsma

Garet&Co dancers

Jennifer Almquist

On Saturday, March 9, the people of Norfolk, Connecticut, enjoyed a dance performance by northern Connecticut-based Garet&Co, in Battell Chapel, titled INTERIOR, consisting of four pieces: “Forgive Her, Hera,” “Something We Share,” “bodieshatewomen,” and “I kinda wish the apocalypse would just happen already.”

At the sold-out show in the round, the dancers, whose strength, grace and athleticism filled the hall with startling passion, wove their movements within the intimate space to the rhythms of contemporary music. Wierdsma choreographed each piece and curated the music. The track she created for “Something We Share” eerily contained vintage soundtracks from life guidance recordings for the perfect woman of the ‘50s. The effect, with three dancers in satin slips posing before imaginary mirrors, was feminist in its message and left the viewer full of vicarious angst.

Keep ReadingShow less
Dealing with invasive species

Sam Schultz, terrestrial invasive species coordinator with PRISM, is holding a tool she calls a “best friend” in the battle against invasives: the hand grubber. She was one of the presenters at the Copake Grange for a talk about invasive species Saturday, March 2.

L. Tomaino

According to Sam Schultz, terrestrial invasive species coordinator with the state Department of Environmental Conservation’s Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Management (PRISM), one of the best ways to battle invasive species is with a hand tool called the hand grubber.

In her work in managing invasive species, she refers to it as a “best friend.” Schultz and Colleen Lutz, assistant biologist with the New York Natural Heritage Program, delivered a lecture on invasive species at the Copake Grange Saturday, March 2.

Keep ReadingShow less
Arts Day for young creatives

Fourth graders at Arts Day

Lynn Mellis Worthington

Fourth graders from all of the schools in Region One gathered Wednesday, March 6, at the independent Kent School to expand their artistic horizons.

It was the 28th year that Region One has held Fourth Grade Arts Day, and this year’s event was coordinated by Kent Center School music teacher David Poirier. He quickly pointed out, however, that it was a team effort involving all of the art and music teachers in the region. He also saluted Geoff Stewart of Kent School, chair of the performing arts department and director of the theater.

Keep ReadingShow less